 |
| James Randolph
receives award for 25 years of service from Los Angeles County Assessor, Rick
Auerbach. |
BENEFITS OF A
CONSULTATION
Letting the Assessor determine your property value is like letting the Fox guard the Hen house!
As your Consumer Advocate, I can help you find out if you could benefit from having
your property reassessed. There are many California State Propositions that a
homeowner can take advantage of...but most people do not know about them. It takes
a professional with experience to evaluate your situation.
You may be eligible to lower your property taxes. Depending on the circumstances, homeowners can benefit from having their property reassessed. A current example is the California Wildfire Disaster. If you home was damaged or lost - YOU NEED TO CALL ME!!
You may be eligible for tax relief - don't wait!!
There are many California State Propositions that a homeowner can take advance of...but most people do not know about them. It takes a professional with experience to evaluate your situation.
- Senior Citizen's Replacement Dwelling Benefit
- Disabled Persons Claim for Transfer of Base-Year Value to Replacement Dwelling
- Reassessment Exclusion for Real Property Transfers: Between Parent and Child
- Reassessment Exclusion for Real Property Transfers: From Grandparent to Grandchild
- Disaster Relief: Property Damaged by Misfortune or Calamity
- Market Value Decline
- Eminent Domain
- Standard Homeowners’ Exemption
- Veterans' Exemption
- Disabled Veterans’ Exemption
- Assessment of Manufactured Homes
- Institutional Exemptions
- Builders’ Exclusion
Some History
Proposition 13, Proposition 62 & Proposition 218
In 1978, voters approved Proposition 13, a constitutional amendment lowering property taxes and placing other restrictions on local government taxation. Proposition 13 also required two- thirds voter approval of special taxes imposed by cities, counties and special districts. General taxes were not subject to a popular vote requirement. In 1982, the California Supreme Court determined that special taxes were taxes earmarked for a specific purpose, whereas general taxes were taxes that were placed in the general fund to be used for general government purposes.
In 1986, voters approved Proposition 62, a statutory initiative which required majority voter approval of local general taxes and restated the two-thirds voter approval requirement for local special taxes. However, in response to subsequent California court decisions, which labeled the general tax vote requirement unconstitutional, cities, counties and other local governments increased or imposed new general taxes in the 1990s without voter approval. These commonly took the form of utility users taxes, business license fees and hotel taxes.
On November 6, 1996, Proposition 218 took effect. Proposition 218 makes clear that property-related "fees" are taxes and not fees if such "fees" are used for general public services. Thus, through Proposition 218 the voters have sent a clear message that the intentions of the voters in passing Proposition 13 cannot be so easily thwarted by calling a tax a "fee," because a tax by another name is still a tax.
|
|
|